When checking if you should renderTriggered make sure controls[key] exists#3912
Merged
graceguo-supercat merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom Nov 21, 2017
Merged
Conversation
graceguo-supercat
approved these changes
Nov 21, 2017
graceguo-supercat
left a comment
graceguo-supercat
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for fixing it!!
LGTM
michellethomas
added a commit
to michellethomas/panoramix
that referenced
this pull request
May 24, 2018
wenchma
pushed a commit
to wenchma/incubator-superset
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 16, 2018
mistercrunch
added
🏷️ bot
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@graceguo-supercat @mistercrunch
When switching visualization type
np.controlsandthis.props.controlsare different, sothis.props.controls[key]is undefined. Alternatively, I could do a check to make sure the viz types are the same, but this seemed like a more explicit check.